Denial of Access to Justice

What is the Analysis?

In Cases 0–3 Bagrash published all original documents — with almost no personal commentary. In this section he references those documents and explains what he believes they prove.

The 10 thematic points are what he regards as the most important questions in his case — for journalists, UN bodies, members of parliament, and anyone wishing to form their own view.

10 Points of Analysis

1. What really happened at Lepsiusstraße → Case 0, Case 1

2. What does "final verdict" mean? Retroactive constitutional violation → Case 1

3. BGH rulings — new interpretation of the law → Case 1

4. Refusal to dismiss defence counsel → Case 2, Case 3

5. Denial of access to case files → Case 2

6. Document forgery by VRiLG Groß → Case 2

7. Conspiracy between detention facility and Senate — with evidence → Case 2

8. Denial of access to court clerk → Case 2

9. Grounds for retrial: Feoktistov, OSCE, OStA Wachs → Case 0, Case 1

10. Early release contingent on confession — unconstitutional → Case 2

Denial of Access to Justice

What is the Analysis?

10 Points of Analysis

📁 Google Drive — Analysis